This is generally because of the difficulty in proving legal. The insanity defense varies greatly from state to state. Individual states typically operate under one of two tests. The insanity defense refers to a defense that a defendant can plead in a criminal trial.
The four tests for insanity are the mnaghten test, the irresistibleimpulse test, the durham rule, and the model penal code test. It is based on the assumption that at the time of the crime, the defendant was suffering from severe mental illness and therefore, was incapable of appreciating the nature of the crime and differentiating right from wrong behavior, hence making them not legally accountable for crime. The history of the insanity defense goes back as far as government. She drives her two sons, aged three and five, out to the lake. While the insanity defense is a legal doctrine, at its heart it is the expression of a moral principle found in societies across time and multiple cultures. The insanity defense is rooted in the belief that conviction and punishment are justified only if the defendant deserves them.
All four of these states, with the exception of kansas, allow guilty but insane verdicts, which often provide for institutionalization in lieu of prison. Inside the disturbed and disturbing criminal mind paradis, cheryl, ramsland, katherine on. The insanity defense is a tactic that is rarely used and rarely successful. Competency is determined by whether the defendant can understand the nature and consequences of the criminal proceedings against him and whether he can assist in his defense. Insanity defense wex legal dictionary encyclopedia lii. Grachek introduction a mentally ill prisoner responded to the stress of hearing another prisoners. The insanity defense is classified as an excuse defense, rather than a justification defense.
Unfortunately, however, the debate has been dominated by slogans and stereotypes and by an inappropriate array of law against psychiatry, retribution against rehabilitation. In fact, before the formalization of psychiatry as a specific discipline within medicine, doctors were involved in assisting the. In order to appreciate the use of the insanity defense, it is necessary to understand how it is used in the criminal justice system. Federal courts use the mnaghten test to determine if someone is legally. However, the insanity defense is rarely used and hardly ever successful.
Robbinsthe volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas. All tests of the insanity defense require that the accused person suffer from a mental disorder. Which one do you believe is best for the courts to apply. Grachek introduction a mentally ill prisoner responded to the stress of hearing another prisoners murder by cutting himself, and was subsequently given a disciplinary report and. Insanity defense legal definition of insanity defense. Insanity defense is primarily used in criminal prosecutions. Jan 01, 2007 skepticism toward the insanity defense also manifests itself in a number of erroneous insanity myths identified by perlin. Within a month of the trials conclusion, committees of the house and senate held hearings regarding use of the insanity defense. Insanity defense is a legal concept, not a clinical one medical one.
The insanity defense is rarely used, and even more rarely success. Today, psychologists may perform tests to determine whether or not the defendant is mentally stable. John hinckleys assassination attempt on ronald reagan 1981 became another landmark in the history of the insanity defense. List of books and articles about insanity defense online. This means that just suffering from a mental disorder is not sufficient to prove insanity. Pdf although the insanity defense is used infrequently, it has received significant attention from. Weiner for more than two decades, the legal literature has been filled with articles on the insanity defense. There are times when the insanity defense, with all the controversy that surrounds it, is in the news. It is also the oldest and was created in england in 1843. The durham standard was a much more lenient guideline for the insanity defense, but it addressed the issue of convicting mentally ill defendants, which was allowed under the mnaghten rule. Its one of the most widely used of a number of evaluation tools designed to detect fabrication or exaggeration of symptoms. Insanity as a tort defence oxford journal of legal. To avoid the noose or the guillotine, criminals of the era would fake symptoms from the.
In my opinion the iunsanity defense is impossible to maintain on the basis of rules such as the mnaghten rule, and the relationship between law and psychiatry must be reestablished on a more scientific level, based on the neurological work now going on in the brain sciences. Psychiatric annals mental health professionals need a basic understanding of the insanity defense. The insanity defense has been a topic of much controversy because of its perceived means of excusing someone from a crime that has been committed. In an insanity defense, the defendant admits the action, but asserts a lack of culpability based on a mental illness. Thinking about the insanity defense answers ninetyseven frequently asked questions and presents sixteen case examples in easily understood language.
Levi arons mental troubles shouldnt render him innocent. Indeed, as will be proven, the insanity defense in itself has been stretched nearly to its breaking point. List of books and articles about insanity defense online research. I learned while writing this book that in some jurisdictions, particularly in. State laws a few states dont allow the insanity defense against criminal charges, including idaho, kansas, montana, and utah. Insanity is not an excuse since it requires proof that the defendant was unable to understand and respond to reasons. The layman often regards the insanity defense as a device by which the criminal avoids the consequences of his crime. This includes participants who found the defendant ngri in all three legal test conditions, and also the participants who found the defendant to have a partial. A three judge panel rejected her insanity plea, convicting her of murder friday a defense claimed she suffered from schizoaffective disorder during the killings and continues to suffer from the. It is highly likely that james holmes, who is facing 142 felony counts in connection with the aurora, colorado shootings on july 22, 2012, will raise an insanity defense. Discover librarianselected research resources on insanity defense from the questia online library, including fulltext online books, academic journals, magazines, newspapers and more.
The four tests used for determining legal insanity the insanity defense often stirs up quite a bit of debate, especially among members of the public who may not be fully aware of how courts determine whether or not a person is legally insane. Experts have been debating that question since the creation of the insanity defense in the mid19th century. The insanity defense is the subject of much debate because it excuses even the most evil and abhorrent conduct, and in many jurisdictions, legal insanity functions as a perfect defense resulting in acquittal. Richard rogers, the psychologist who created the sirs test in 1992 and updated it in 2010, told me how forensic psychologists use tests and interview techniques to find the fakers. However, the durham standard drew much criticism because of its expansive definition of legal insanity. During the three years following the hinckley acquittal, congress and half of the states enacted changes in the insanity defense, all limiting use of the defense. Criminal liability requires proof of three interrelated components as follows. Annals of law about the insanity defense and the trial of john w. Though it is available to people charged with virtually any crime, and is often employed without controversy, homicide defendants who raise the insanity defense are often viewed by the public and even the legal system as trying to get away with murder. The bell jar by sylvia plath, one flew over the cuckoos nest by ken kesey, fight club by chuck palahniuk, insanity by cameron. Most states do not allow for vi in the consideration of legal insanity.
The concept of insanity is a legal term, not a clinical term, and thus there is no clinical means of having a defendant in a criminal case declared sane or insane by mental health professionals. Advocates say that means seriously ill people can be executed where in other states they wouldnt be convicted at all, and it. Hinckley claimed the assassination attempt was intended to impress actor jodie foster. The insanity defense reveals many sides of woody allen as he holds forth on the most human of urges why does man kill. The legal system applies three tests to determine whether a. This study suggests that to fail to account for vi in the application of the insanity defense may be a mistake for several reasons. Such tests try to ascertain whether or not a defendant can distinguish right from wrong, and whether or not he acted on an irresistible impulse. Consequently, insanity and cognate defences, such as infancy and diminished responsibility, must be housed separately.
The types of mental disorders that are accepted as meeting. The insanity defense is one of the oldest fixtures of the angloamerican legal tradition. The legal system applies three tests to determine whether a suspect should be held not responsible. Almost 20 years after the ali test was created, john hinckley jr. For more than a century, the insanity defense has been the most passionately debated issue in criminal law, the focal point of deeply rooted conflicts as to the function of a law of crime. Compiled by members of a harvard seminar, it directs attention to the issues most often raised by the general. For federal crimes, the hinckley case led to the passage of the insanity defense reform act, which requires that defendants prove the defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence.
Defense lawyers are well aware of the benefit to the defendant of any defense, and the insanity defense is no exception. Insanity as a tort defence oxford journal of legal studies. The criminal defense of insanity defendants who are determined to have been insane at the time they committed a crime are entitled to the criminal defense of not guilty by reason of insanity. All tests of the insanity defense require that the accused person suffer from a mental. The insanity defense is a hot topic in todays crime dramas. First, persons assessed as insane due to vi have serious psychiatric diagnoses, consisting primarily of psychotic disorders.
Discussion has centered around the standard used to excuse someone from criminal responsibility,2. The types of mental disorders that are accepted as meeting the criteria for the insanity defense vary with jurisdiction. Apart from combating these myths, advocates of the insanity defense contend that a fundamental principle of criminal law is at stake. The insanity defense is one of the oldest fixtures of the angloamerican legal. The insanity defense will be critically examined, here, and proven in some cases necessary while others have no right using the plea. Insanity insanity encompasses mental abnormalities that may affect legal responsibility. The insanity defense is considered one of the most controversial, most. If this analysis is accepted it seems difficult to fault it, epsteins argument founders. Check your understanding of the insanity defense with an interactive quiz and printable worksheet.
The first booklength rhetorical history and analysis of the insanity defense. The concept of insanity is now typically referenced as criminal responsibility, whether or not the defendant is responsible for criminal conduct that occurred while the. The insanity defense has nothing to do with a defendants current mental status. What are the various tests used for the insanity defense.
The insanity defense has a long history, and is evolved after many tests that have. The mnaghten insanity defense, also called the rightwrong test, is the most common. Those who use the mnaghten rule of law, those who use the american law institute ali model penal code, and those who have abolished the use of the insanity defense. This volume provides a clear and compelling introduction to one of the most important topics in the relation between psychology and law. Competency versus insanity criminal law consulting for. The insanity defense is used by criminal defendants. Mom convicted of killing 2 kids, insanity defense rejected. There is no single standard for considering an insanity defense in american courts of law. A successful insanity defense allows a defendant to be found not guilty by reason of. This article provides an overview of the historical origins of the defense and current application. This defense has been controversially applied over the years, for it has resulted in not guilty verdicts in several highprofile cases. Ask a televisionsaturated college student how often they believe this defense is used in court and they estimate that it is employed about onethird of the time lilienfeld 8.
How recent united states supreme court case law can improve the system julie e. Mental disorder, as used in the insanity defense, is a legal term with a legal definition that varies with jurisdiction. Insanity defensea defense asserted by an accused in a criminal prosecution to avoid liability for the commission of a crime because, at the time of the crime, the person did not appreciate the nature or quality or wrongfulness of the acts. Insanity defense tested in supreme court the supreme court hears arguments in an arizona case about the use of the insanity defense in the case of. The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for his or her actions due to an episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act.
Which test of insanity from the model penal code incorporates both the appreciation and control components of other tests. In this book, charles patrick ewing attempts to correct the many public and. This is contrasted with an excuse of provocation, in which the. The authors conclude that standard tests of insanity may in fact. Oct 29, 2011 for empirical research concerning these views see valerie p hans, an analysis of public attitudes towards the insanity defense 1986 24 criminology 393. Aapl practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation. Apr 19, 2006 insanity defense tested in supreme court the supreme court hears arguments in an arizona case about the use of the insanity defense in the case of a delusional man convicted of killing a police. Essay about the insanity defense 1184 words bartleby. Although the insanity defense is extremely popular in the media, books, and pop culture, law students are taught that the insanity defense is rarely used, and even more rarely successful. Mar 17, 2017 the durham standard was a much more lenient guideline for the insanity defense, but it addressed the issue of convicting mentally ill defendants, which was allowed under the mnaghten rule.
Involvement in cases that concern the insanity defense is without a doubt the best known of the roles that psychiatrists play at the interface of medicine and the law. The defendant has the burden of proving the defense of insanity by a preponderance of the evidence which is similar to a civil case. The truth is that the insanity defense is a risky one at best. Court of appeals for the third circuit to reexamine the admissibility. Comprising the classic bestsellers getting even, without feathers, and side effects, this definitive collection of comic writings is from a man who needs no introduction. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. A crime of insanity insanity on trial frontline pbs. The m naghten insanity defense, also called the rightwrong test, is the most common insanity defense in the united states. Establishing insanity currently, states rely on four different tests to determine whether a defendant is legally insane.
252 1333 1221 926 52 845 949 955 254 339 1506 1189 404 680 1049 1153 667 385 736 187 1432 630 660 507 790 817 183 223 374 26 816 185 424 890 980 1096 467 359 1125